|
Welcome,
Guest
|
Rapid Climate Change
(1 viewing) (1) Guest
TOPIC: Rapid Climate Change
Rapid Climate Change 2 years, 1 month ago #8901
|
|
|
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 10 months ago #10037
|
|
|
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 10 months ago #10041
|
|
pepsi = coke lowes = home depot
wal*mart = target democrat = republican in America we have the freedom to choose. i hope you get the big picture divide and conquer problem reaction solution pawns in the game If any man have an ear, let him hear "And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority |
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 10 months ago #10068
|
Occam wrote:
Satellites Detect Extensive Drought Impact on Amazon Forests Amazon Forest Shows Unexpected Resiliency During Drought www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070923193644.htm Hmm.... guess it just depends on who funds the study...  |
|
Maxim M250
Heating house & DHW I support Global Warming |
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 8 months ago #10397
|
|
Maxim M250
Heating house & DHW I support Global Warming |
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 8 months ago #10398
|
|
|
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 8 months ago #10403
|
|
Maxim M250
Heating house & DHW I support Global Warming |
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 8 months ago #10405
|
|
Dell Point Europa
|
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 8 months ago #10406
|
|
|
Re: Rapid Climate Change 1 year, 8 months ago #10420
|
Occam wrote:
jdeere5220 wrote: Cloudy outlook for global-warming faithful www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/30...al-warming-faithful/ Guess it's just someone else mis-reading the Nature paper. Why are you such a dupe, didn't you say you went to college? Read the paper yourself. Stop looking to biased media sources to tell you what to think. Wouldn't it be fun to go back to the old forum and dig up what you said then about Svensmark  Oh, and this is just the beginning, not the end. The whole of the criticism by his detractors was that Svensmark's hypothesis of the mechanism was bunk. A graph they'd prefer you not to notice. Tucked away near the end of online supplementary material, and omitted from the printed CLOUD paper in Nature, it clearly shows how cosmic rays promote the formation of clusters of molecules (“particles”) that in the real atmosphere can grow and seed clouds. In an early-morning experimental run at CERN, starting at 03.45, ultraviolet light began making sulphuric acid molecules in the chamber, while a strong electric field cleansed the air of ions. It also tended to remove molecular clusters made in the neutral environment (n) but some of these accumulated at a low rate. As soon as the electric field was switched off at 04.33, natural cosmic rays (gcr) raining down through the roof of the experimental hall in Geneva helped to build clusters at a higher rate. How do we know they were contributing? Because when, at 04.58, CLOUD simulated stronger cosmic rays with a beam of charged pion particles (ch) from the accelerator, the rate of cluster production became faster still. The various colours are for clusters of different diameters (in nanometres) as recorded by various instruments. The largest (black) took longer to grow than the smallest (blue). This is Fig. S2c from supplementary online material for J. Kirkby et al., Nature, 476, 429-433, © Nature 2011  calderup.wordpress.com/2011/08/24/cern-e...s-cosmic-ray-action/ |
|
|
